Warning: Small to moderate amounts of
literary pretention to follow.
Tom decided
that he had written enough theological posts for the moment, and that it was
time for some more about writing.
Specifically, he was going to write about perspectives.
Most of the
stuff he had written had been done in the first person (i.e “I walked down the
street”), and for reasons unbeknownst to him, this was the perspective he was
most comfortable with, and the one that gave him the best fit into his
characters’ skins. The current magnum
opus, Three Men on a Pilgrimage, was written in the first person, as were the
many very silly parody stories that he wrote back in uni, and many of the
marginally less silly short stories he’s written since. Of the four and half NaNoWriMo’s he had
attempted, three were in the first person, and the other one and a half were
rubbish.
There were
sometimes good reasons for this. Certainly
in the case of Three Men on a Pilgrimage, he was imitating the style of Jerome
K Jerome’s ‘Three Men in a Boat’, which is written as an account of a boating
holiday by one of the three men in question, and so is naturally written in the
first person. The parodies that Tom had
written in university based on the Allan Quatermain novels were in the first
person for the same imitative reasons.
The second NaNo novel, about Bow Street Runners in an alternative
history London was vaguely based on contemporary novels by Defoe, Smollett and
Swift, all of whom tended to write ‘memoir’ type novels written in the first
person as account of the main character’s adventures.
In fact,
generally Tom’s favoured reading also tended to come in the first person. As well as older stuff like the aforementioned Swift and Defoe, and Rider Haggard and Jerome, he also favoured the
first person when it came to modern works.
The Dresden Files by Jim Butcher, The Adventures of Captain Alatriste by
Arturo Perez-Reverte and the Eisenhorn and Ravenor trilogies by Dan Abnett were
all written in the first person. Both
when reading and writing, Tom always found it easier to get inside the
experiences of a character when he was reading about them from their own
perspective, as opposed to that of some invisible and omnipresent Narrator, who
was still able to get inside characters’ heads and see what they were thinking
or remembering.
This was also
an issue when it came to roleplay games.
Some people preferred to say “I attack the orc” when what they really
meant was “My character attacks the orc,” while others would say “Conrad the
Barbarian attacks the orc”. Certainly
for Tom, it again came down to inhabiting the character, ‘getting into the
role’ so to speak, and he thought that that was as important in writing as it
was in roleplaying. The first person perspective gave you a clearer insight into their moods and motivations, and made creating those character significanly easier and more natural sounding.
On the other
hand of course, he was aware that a great many of the best and most popular
books had been written in the third person, and he had enjoyed these as well,
so clearly it was far from clear cut.
Ultimately,
it was all just a matter of perspective.
(And let’s not begin to discuss why
this post, like most third-person writing, was also written in the past tense!)
No comments:
Post a Comment