I’ve made asides to my views
on the concept of rights before, and occasionally promised that I would one day
expand on them. That day has finally
arrived.
Very simply put, I do not believe
in rights. I do not believe in human
rights, fundamental rights, playwrights (no, wait…) or inalienable rights (even
for aliens). People very glibly talk
about ‘human rights’ and what they are, especially their own and especially
when they think that they ought to have something that they’re not getting.
We have written charters of
human rights, right to a home, right to family, right to freedom of expression
and freedom of religious and freedom of assembly, to clean water and food,
clothing, education etc. etc. etc. and so on and so forth; a bill of
interminable rights. And to have these
charters and bills is extremely praiseworthy, a laudable attempt to make sure
that everyone has a good standard of life.
If you accept the concept as a given, then it all makes perfect sense.
However, I do not accept the
base premise. Why do we have any rights
at all? Where do they come from? What are ‘rights’? The dictionary tells us that a right is “A
moral or legal entitlement to have or do something.” The definition given by Wikipedia is better;
“Rights are legal, social, or ethical principles of freedom or entitlement;
that is, rights are the fundamental normative rules about what is allowed of
people or owed to people, according to some legal system, social convention, or
ethical theory.”
Perhaps I should restate my
position slightly. I do not object to the concept
of rights per se, but to the
conception of rights as it seems to be in the minds of many people. People seem to think that rights are
fundamental, built into the laws of physics, objective, self-evident and
absolute. I think that they are far more
important than that.
I’ve seen a placard in a
picture of a protest bearing the slogan ‘Education is a right, not a
privilege’. I disagree. Education is a privilege, and being so, is
much more important than a right.
Freedom is a privilege, family is a privilege, even food and water and
life are privileges, and not everyone has them.
Now, please don’t think for a moment that I’m suggesting that some people
ought not to have them; quite the opposite.
However, I think that if you assume that these things are inalienable
rights that people ought to have ‘just because’, it’s far too easy to
undervalue them.
Living in the UK, I am
fortunate to live in a society that permits me these privileges. I could very easily have been born in a place
or a time period in which I do not have access to all or any of these
privileges, and I am extremely grateful for the fact that I have been. I’m not suggesting that we should live in a
state of grovelling gratitude to our governments for supplying and enforcing
these privileges, rather we should very carefully watch them to ensure that
they continue to do so.
But why should I care whether
others have these privileges, as long as I do?
Well, ultimately it’s a case of ‘Do as you would be done by’. I consider them to be a Good Thing, and it is
right that all people should share these privileges; I continue to contend that
this is not the same as them being ‘rights’.
Indeed, because it is right that people should have them, they stop
being privileges, and become more important still; they become
responsibilities. I do not have the
right to be free; I have the responsibility to use my freedom well, and to
ensure the freedom of others. I do not
have the right to free speech; I have the responsibility to use my speech for
good, and for ensuring that others can do so as well. I do not have the right to life or happiness;
I am responsible for my own, and for the life and happiness of everyone else,
and they are responsible for mine.
The Conservative party has stated that they wish to scrap the EU Declaration of Human Rights. I can't say that this strikes me as a wholly good idea, but if they do, I think that they could do worse than to replace it with a Declaration of Human Responsibilities. If we held people accountable when they failed in their responsibilities, rather than simply allowing people to appeal when they feel they have not been accorded their rights, I think the world would be a much better place.
We seem to think very highly of our rights. It would be a much better world if instead we thought as highly about our responsibilities, and were as grateful for our privileges. It seems to me that we would be less eager to give them up, and less likely to abuse them or take them for granted.
We seem to think very highly of our rights. It would be a much better world if instead we thought as highly about our responsibilities, and were as grateful for our privileges. It seems to me that we would be less eager to give them up, and less likely to abuse them or take them for granted.
But of course, you have every
right to disagree, if you want to.
No comments:
Post a Comment