It's been a long time since my last blog post (February 2020!). Fortunately, absolutely nothing has occurred since then that would require my comment.
What has stirred me to action once more is another children's book. My son is now three, and still requires an awful lot of reading to. Amongst the many books on his bookshelf are several Mr Men books, including Little Miss Sunshine. I do not especially care for this book as it appears on the surface (although it must be admitted that it has aged considerably better than Mr. Tickle). However, a deeper and fuller literary analysis, such as that to which I exposed The Elephant and the Bad Baby reveals a considerable subtext and reveals the full strength of Roger Hargreaves' satirical skill.
Little Miss Sunshine: A Biting Satirical Critique of the Dismissal of Mental Illness and its Sufferers
Little Miss Sunshine (Hargreaves, 1981) is an excellent
book, replete with a dry, ironic humour that is very easy to miss. Typical of
Hargreaves' subtle, sarcastic wit, on the surface it's the straightforward tale
of how Little Miss Sunshine helps to cheer up the King of Miseryland. Indeed,
some people even seem to take this story at face value. However, in this essay,
I will demonstrate that it is in fact a detailed and compassionate study of the
way mental illness is dismissed and disregarded, and a cutting critique of the way
sufferers are patronised and ignored.
ATTENTION, IF YOU HAVE NOT READ LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE, THERE
WILL BE SPOILERS BELOW
To summarise the plot, we are first introduced to
Miseryland, where everyone is miserable all the time. Even the birds and
earthworms are miserable. The king of Miseryland is worst of all, sitting on
his throne all day long and crying his eyes out.
Little Miss Sunshine sees a road sign for Miseryland, and on
a whim decides to visit, passing a sign which warns that smiling, laughing, giggling
and all other displays of happiness are forbidden by royal decree. She drives
on and arrives at the royal castle where she carelessly smiles at a guard and
is promptly arrested.
She is marched through the castle to the throne room, where
she is denounced to the king, who is now even more miserable than before.
Little Miss Sunshine asks if he would like to be happy. He replies that he
would, but he can’t, because they’re in Miseryland. Little Miss Sunshine drives
him back out to the sign, and uses a marker pen to re-write it, making
happiness legal and renaming the country Laughter Land. The king (and
presumably everyone else) can now be happy, and Little Miss Sunshine goes home.
That’s the plot as it is presented, but I believe that
Hargreaves’ true intention with this piece was otherwise than might first
appear. I would suggest that the true focus of this work, indeed the true
protagonist is not, as first appears, Little Miss Sunshine, but the king.
When we are first introduced to him, we are told that he
sits on his throne all day long, crying. Now one might think that the most
important piece of information here is that he is crying. I would contend that
the most important thing is that he is on his throne. This is clearly a man
struggling with the most severe clinical depression, and yet every single day,
he gets out of bed, he gets dressed, he goes out and HE DOES HIS JOB. He might
be sitting there with the tears streaming down his face, but he IS sitting
there. Anyone who has themselves struggled with depression, or who knows
someone who has, will know what a heroic effort this can sometimes be.
Then Little Miss Sunshine arrives. She enters Miseryland,
and is immediately informed of the laws and customs of the country she has come
to. She heads for the seat of government, and in a staggering display of
cultural insensitivity immediately breeches these laws, to the shock and upset
of the member of the local law enforcement who has come to welcome her. She is
rightly arrested, and taken straight to the king to receive justice (displaying
the efficiency of the Miserian legal system).
She is presented to the king, and her list of crimes
recited, to the king’s significant distress. Rather than take the time to try
and learn the history of the country, and discover why Miseryland is so
miserable, so that she can actually try and help, Little Miss Sunshine pours
scorn on the country’s long-held customs. Then she says something that will
surely stick in the craw of anyone who has ever suffered from depression.
‘Well, have you just tried being happy?’
Of course! Why hadn’t the king thought of that? Why didn’t
he just stop being depressed? Genius. Little Miss Sunshine is presented as one
of those obnoxious people who thinks that the best way to cure someone of
depression is to be gratuitously, pointedly happy at them. I do not know
whether Roger Hargreaves ever suffered from depression himself and received
this ‘helpful’ advice, but this section is certainly pointed, his ironic wit
skewering the grinning would-be helper with rapier precision.
Overbearing the king’s objections, Little Miss Sunshine
marches him back through his own castle, bundles him into her car and drives
back to the sign. Here, without so much as a ‘by your leave’, she vandalises
it, rewriting the time-honoured traditions of Miseryland, and even renaming the
country entirely. The paternalistic and colonialist overtones of this are
clear, Hargreaves imbuing Little Miss Sunshine with an impenetrable certainty
that her ways of doing things are inherently and manifestly better than those
of the country she has stumbled in to, without even pausing to ask why things
might be the way they are in the first place.
Rather than have her executed on the spot, the king
capitulates (or at least pretends to). He forces a smile, a laugh even,
presenting an outwardly happy exterior despite the fact that nothing has been
done to actually treat the crippling depression that must surely still be
consuming him from within. This at least has the intended effect of making
Little Miss Sunshine leave, convinced that she has helped. When she gets home,
she brags to Mr Happy that she has wiped Miseryland from the map, having
committed cultural genocide and ridden roughshod over the true feelings of the
inhabitants without having to put in the effort of actually helping at all.
Roger Hargreaves’ dry, sarcastic, needle-sharp critique of
the way mental illness is so often dismissed, and its sufferers patronised and
infantilised, is just as relevant now as when it was first published. It is a
rebuke to those who would dismiss mental illness as (pardon the expression) a
figment of the mind, and reading it, and understanding the message concealed
within makes me very happy indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment